嗟嗟嗟也好 JJJ也罷 搞出像Jan Hendrick Schon的造假事件才會讓人大呼"這這這"(台語發音)吧
相對於為人確知、一翻兩瞪眼的造假，上^n 期經濟學人這篇文章講的，似乎更令人憂慮http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21588069-scientific-research-has-changed-world-now-it-needs-change-itself-how-science-goes-wrong還有這個http://www.economist.com/news/briefing/21588057-scientists-think-science-self-correcting-alarming-degree-it-not-trouble"Too many of the findings that fill the academic ether are the result of shoddy experiments or poor analysis (see article). A rule of thumb among biotechnology venture-capitalists is that half of published research cannot be replicated. Even that may be optimistic. Last year researchers at one biotech firm, Amgen, found they could reproduce just six of 53 “landmark” studies in cancer research. Earlier, a group at Bayer, a drug company, managed to repeat just a quarter of 67 similarly important papers. A leading computer scientist frets that three-quarters of papers in his subfield are bunk. In 2000-10 roughly 80,000 patients took part in clinical trials based on research that was later retracted because of mistakes or improprieties."
版主的閱讀範疇著實廣泛.佩服佩服.在下不知道經濟學人什麼的, 倒是在娛樂版上讀到過以音色高亢著稱的一位女歌手後來嫁給了華爾街台籍買辦叫什麼ㄒㄩㄝˊ ㄖㄣˊ的.哈哈.借用一句"女人香"電影裡的台詞:"If you make a mistake get all tangled up, just tango on!". 或許可作一註解.
算不上什麼閱讀啦，手機上看看app的editor's choice ，有興趣再去官網點一兩篇來看罷了身在異國，總是得看一點洋玩意兒應景啊